This blog post reflects on the legislative history and jurisprudence behind Section 9(3) of CDPA—a provision that purports to offer copyright protection for computer-generated works.
Last Friday, Katie Fortney and Authors Alliance jointly submitted a comment in response to the USCO’s notice of inquiry on the CCB. In the comment, we acknowledged the CCB’s efforts to create user-friendly processes and commended its commitment to making the system accessible to non-lawyers.
The last few days have been quite dramatic for anyone paying attention to copyright law and policy. The Generative AI
Last night a number of news outlets reported that President Trump had fired the Librarian of Congress, Carla Hayden. This
In late March, OpenAI made it possible to “Ghiblify” yourself — using its newest version of ChatGPT, with updated image
Below is an interview with Charles Watkinson, Director of the University of Michigan Press and Associate University Librarian for Publishing
The creators of Superman sold their rights for just $130 in 1938, igniting decades of lawsuits over ownership and fair treatment. Now, the battle continues as Shuster’s heir claims to hold certain foreign rights…
Chinese courts are recognizing AI-generated works as copyrightable, and these rulings could potentially impact those in the US under certain circumstances.
On March 3, librarians, authors, publishers, and technologists gathered at Northeastern University Library in Boston to contribute to a startup
This is a post authored by Maria Crusey, an intern with Authors Alliance and a third-year law student at Washington
