Accelerated NIH Public Access Deadline: FAQs for Authors, Librarians and Research Administrators
The NIH public access policy’s accelerated July 1 implementation date is rapidly approaching. Adding to the challenge, some publishers are […]
The NIH public access policy’s accelerated July 1 implementation date is rapidly approaching. Adding to the challenge, some publishers are […]
We’ve received many questions from authors, librarians, and research administrators about the NIH decision to accelerate implementation of its public
Below is an interview with Charles Watkinson, Director of the University of Michigan Press and Associate University Librarian for Publishing
The creators of Superman sold their rights for just $130 in 1938, igniting decades of lawsuits over ownership and fair treatment. Now, the battle continues as Shuster’s heir claims to hold certain foreign rights…
We’ve heard from lots of authors with questions about AI licensing of their works by their publishers. Cambridge University Press
Audible has a history of relying on ambiguous contractual terms to reduce author payouts. Despite Audible’s track record, the courts were unsympathetic to Teri Woods’ grievances.
At the heart of the Flynn v. McGraw Hill case is a breach of contract claim. The plaintiffs argue that McGraw Hill’s royalty deductions for maintaining its online system violated the terms of the agreement. Central to the argument is the publisher’s promise to ‘publish at its own expense.’ This case serves as a prime example of how important it is to scrutinize the details of a publishing agreement, where the devil often lies.
Authors Alliance and SPARC are excited to announce a new collaboration to address critical legal issues surrounding open access to